A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

avatar
Foresight News
1 months ago
This article is approximately 572 words,and reading the entire article takes about 1 minutes
Is it good or bad for scientific research projects to make money by hyping memes and then donate them?

Original author: Alex Liu, Foresight News

DeSci + Meme is still hot, what are the good angles? Do these meme coins really contribute to science? Some people cant stand it anymore and shout (hype desci all day long) Have you ever donated a penny to sci-hub?

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

What is Sci-hub?

According to Wikipedia, Sci-Hub is a shadow library. It uses different methods to bypass publishers paywalls. In 2011, Kazakh graduate student Alexandra Elbakyan decided to found Sci-Hub because the cost of research papers behind paywalls was too high. Its users are all over the world. In February 2021, Sci-Hubs homepage showed that it stored more than 85 million papers.

Sci-Hub and Elbakyan have been sued for copyright infringement twice in the United States. Both times, the defendants failed in absentia. Sci-Hub has been praised by the scientific, academic, and publishing communities for effectively disseminating scientific knowledge and providing government-funded research results to the public for free. Publishers have criticized it for copyright infringement, reducing their own revenue, and endangering the network security of universities (but publishers may just be exaggerating the threat. Sci-Hub has also induced publishers to set stricter paywalls.)

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

In her defense of Sci-Hub, Elbakyan would in turn question whether the publishers business practices were ethical and consistent with Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. She insisted that running Sci-Hub was a moral imperative and that the law should not stop her. She once said, If all Americans obeyed the evil law, they would still be ruled by queens today and slavery would still exist.

Meme coin scihub

Have you ever donated a penny to sci-hub? 0x AA, former chairman of the Peking University Blockchain Association, thought this question made sense, so he donated 0.1 ETH.

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

But if it just stopped at donations, there would be no exciting story afterwards - 0x AA bought 22% of the supply of scihubs meme coin of the same name.

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

This meme coin called scihub has reached a market cap of $70 million overnight. And 0x AA holds 22% of the tokens, which are worth tens of millions of dollars. Will he donate 20% of the tokens as promised? Does donating 20% of the supply justify this crazy hype?

At the beginning, Sci-hubs founder Elbakyan did not agree with the project.

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

But later she added the option to accept SOL wallet donations on the Sci-hub webpage.

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

Afterwards, 0x AA stated that it had reached a consensus with Elbakyan and would keep its promise to donate 20% of the tokens.

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

dispute

The incident caused great controversy in the Chinese community, mainly divided into two points:

Insider trading allegations

Some people have accused 0x AA of insider trading. 22% is only the number of tokens held in its public wallet, and the number of tokens actually controlled is much higher than this ratio.

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

Why not just donate?

Is it to help scientific research or a money game? Some people think that donations should be made directly instead of hyping memes.

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

0x AA also said frankly, I want to make money, the kind that everyone can make together. He hopes that everyone can win together, profit from meme coins, and support the operation of Sci-hub.

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

Supporters views

Opponents have their own opinions, and there are also many people in the community who support 0x AAs behavior, comparing the behavior of raising funds through memes and then donating part of the chips to the lottery model.

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

A quick look at the scihub controversy: is it a boost to scientific research or a money game?

Original article, author:Foresight News。Reprint/Content Collaboration/For Reporting, Please Contact report@odaily.email;Illegal reprinting must be punished by law.

ODAILY reminds readers to establish correct monetary and investment concepts, rationally view blockchain, and effectively improve risk awareness; We can actively report and report any illegal or criminal clues discovered to relevant departments.

Recommended Reading
Editor’s Picks